Non-selective beta blocker use is associated with improved short-term survival in patients with cirrhosis referred for liver transplantation

Background Recent evidence cautions against the use of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) in patients with refractory ascites or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis while other data suggests a survival benefit in patients with advanced liver disease. The aim of this study was to describe the use and impact of NSBB in patients with cirrhosis referred for liver transplantation. Methods A single-center cohort of patients with cirrhosis, who were referred and evaluated for liver transplantation between January and June 2012 were studied for baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Patients were grouped according to the use of NSBB at initial evaluation, with the endpoint of 90-day mortality. Results Sixty-five (38%) of 170 consecutive patients evaluated for liver transplantation were taking NSBB. Patients taking NSBB had higher MELD and Child Pugh score. NSBB use was associated with lower 90-day mortality (6% vs. 15%) with a risk adjusted hazard ratio of 0.27 (95%CI .09–0.88, p = .03). Patients taking NSBB developed acute kidney injury (AKI) within 90 days more frequently than patients not taking NSBB (22% vs 11%), p = 0.048). However, this was related to increased stage 1 AKI episodes, all of which resolved. Twelve (27%) of 45 patients with > 90 day follow up discontinued NSBB, most commonly for hypotension and AKI, had increased subsequent MELD and mortality. Conclusions NSBB use in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplant evaluation is associated with better short-term survival. Nevertheless, ongoing tolerance of NSBB in this population is dynamic and may select a subset of patients with better hemodynamic reserve

Vitamin E Improves Transplant‐free Survival and Hepatic Decompensation among Patients with NASH and Advanced Fibrosis

Vitamin E improves liver histology in non‐diabetic adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), but its impact on long‐term patient outcomes is unknown. We evaluated whether vitamin E treatment improves clinical outcomes of NASH patients with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. Two hundred and thirty‐six patients with biopsy‐proven NASH and bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis seen at Indiana University Medical Center between October 2004, and January 2016 were included. Ninety of them took 800 IU/day of vitamin E for ≥ 2 years (vitamin E users) and were propensity matched to 90 adults who did not take vitamin E (controls) after adjusting for fibrosis severity, age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities and their treatment, LDL cholesterol, liver biochemistries and length of follow‐up on vitamin E. Covariate‐adjusted cox and competing risk regression models were assessed to evaluate association between vitamin E treatment and patient outcomes. The median follow‐up was 5.62 (IQR: 4.3‐7.5) and 5.6 (IQR: 4‐6.9) years for vitamin E users and controls respectively. Vitamin E users had higher adjusted transplant‐free survival (78% vs. 49%, P<.01) and lower rates of hepatic decompensation (37% vs. 62%, P=.04) than controls. After controlling for severity of fibrosis, calendar year of patient enrollment and other potential confounders, vitamin E treatment decreased the risk of death or transplant (adj. HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12‐0.74, P<.01) and hepatic decompensation (adj. sHR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28‐0.96, P=.036). These benefits were evident in both diabetics as well as non‐diabetics. Adjusted 10‐year cumulative probability of HCC, vascular events and non‐hepatic cancers were not different between vitamin E exposed and controls

Post hoc analyses of surrogate markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes in a digitally supported continuous care intervention: An open-label, non-randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE: One year of comprehensive continuous care intervention (CCI) through nutritional ketosis improves glycosylated haemoglobin(HbA1c), body weight and liver enzymes among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Here, we report the effect of the CCI on surrogate scores of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver fibrosis. METHODS: This was a non-randomised longitudinal study, including adults with T2D who were self-enrolled to the CCI (n=262) or to receive usual care (UC, n=87) during 1 year. An NAFLD liver fat score (N-LFS) >-0.640 defined the presence of fatty liver. An NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) of >0.675 identified subjects with advanced fibrosis. Changes in N-LFS and NFS at 1 year were the main endpoints. RESULTS: At baseline, NAFLD was present in 95% of patients in the CCI and 90% of patients in the UC. At 1 year, weight loss of ≥5% was achieved in 79% of patients in the CCI versus 19% of patients in UC (p<0.001). N-LFS mean score was reduced in the CCI group (-1.95±0.22, p<0.001), whereas it was not changed in the UC (0.47±0.41, p=0.26) (CCI vs UC, p<0.001). NFS was reduced in the CCI group (-0.65±0.06, p<0.001) compared with UC (0.26±0.11, p=0.02) (p<0.001 between two groups). In the CCI group, the percentage of individuals with a low probability of advanced fibrosis increased from 18% at baseline to 33% at 1 year (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One year of a digitally supported CCI significantly improved surrogates of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in patients with T2D

Racial Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Are Not Explained by Differences in Comorbidities, Liver Disease Severity, or Tumor Burden

Black patients have higher mortality and are less likely to receive liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than white patients. Reasons for these disparities have not been fully elucidated. Comorbid disease, liver disease severity, cirrhosis etiologies, and tumor characteristics were compared between black and white patients with HCC seen at the Indiana University Academic Medical Center from January 2000 to June 2014. Logistic regression was used to investigate the primary outcome, which was liver transplantation. Log-rank testing was used to compare survival between the two groups. Subgroup analysis explored reasons for failure to undergo liver transplantation in patients within Milan criteria. The cohort included 1,032 (86%) white and 164 (14%) black patients. Black and white patients had similar Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Pugh scores (CPSs). There was a trend toward larger tumor size (5.3 cm versus 4.7 cm; P = 0.05) in black patients; however, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging and Milan criteria were similar. Black patients were less likely to undergo liver transplantation than white patients; this was a disparity that was not attenuated (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.90) on multivariable analysis. Substance abuse was more frequently cited as the reason black patients within Milan criteria failed to undergo transplantation compared to white patients. Survival was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Racial differences in patient and tumor characteristics were small and did not explain the disparity in liver transplantation. Higher rates of substance abuse in black patients within Milan criteria who failed to undergo transplantation suggest social factors contribute to this disparity in this cohort

Older Age and Disease Duration Are Highly Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, the overall burden of AIH cirrhosis in causing HCC and patients' risk factors are not well understood. Aims: To characterize the proportion of HCC linked to AIH at a large academic health center, and to identify variables associated with HCC in patients with AIH in a case-control study design. Methods: Over a 14.5-year period, medical records of all patients with HCC were reviewed. Cases are AIH patients identified from the cohort, and controls are patients with AIH without HCC. Three controls were randomly chosen from the Genetic Repository of Autoimmune Liver Disease and Coexisting Exposures database for each eligible case. Results: Out of 1250 eligible patients, 20 were linked to AIH (1.6%). Their median age was 64 years, 40% men and 100% Caucasian. Ten percent of AIH patients did not have evidence of cirrhosis at HCC diagnosis. The proportion of HCCs due to AIH decreased during the time intervals of the study. Compared to controls, cases were more likely men (40.0% vs. 18%, p = 0.049), with longer AIH duration (median 16 years vs. 5 years, p = 0.004). Prolonged AIH duration (OR 1.68, p = 0.006) and older age (OR 1.15, p = 0.049) were risk factors for HCC. Conclusions: AIH is a rare cause (1.6%) for HCC in Midwestern USA with a decreasing trend over 14.5 years. Ten percent of AIH-HCC patients did not have cirrhosis at time of HCC diagnosis. Patients with prolonged duration of the disease and older age are at high risk to develop HCC

Cost Effectiveness of Different Strategies for Detecting Cirrhosis in Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Based on United States Health Care System

Background & Aims Several strategies are available for detecting cirrhosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but their cost effectiveness is not clear. We developed a decision model to quantify the accuracy and costs of 9 single or combination strategies, including 3 noninvasive tests (fibrosis-4 [FIB-4], vibration controlled transient elastography [VCTE], and magnetic resonance elastography [MRE]) and liver biopsy, for detection of cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD. Methods Data on diagnostic accuracy, costs, adverse events, and cirrhosis outcomes over a 5-y period were obtained from publications. The diagnostic accuracy, per-patient cost per correct diagnosis of cirrhosis, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated for each strategy for base cirrhosis prevalence values of 0.27%, 2%, and 4%. Results The combination of the FIB-4 and VCTE identified patients with cirrhosis in NAFLD populations with a 0.27%, 2%, and 4% prevalence of cirrhosis with the lowest cost per person ($401,$690, and $1024, respectively) and highest diagnostic accuracy (89.3$491, $781, and$1114, respectively) and diagnostic accuracy (92.4%, 91.6%, 90.6%, respectively). Compared to the combination of FIB-4 and VCTE (least costly), the ICERs were lower for the combination of FIB-4 and MRE ($2864,$2918, and $2921) than the combination of FIB-4 and liver biopsy ($4454, $5156, and$5956) at the cirrhosis prevalence values tested. When goal was to avoid liver biopsy, FIB-4+VCTE and FIB-4+MRE had similar diagnostic accuracies, ranging from 87.5% to 89.3% and 90.6% to 92.4% for cirrhosis diagnosis, although FIB-4+MRE had a slightly higher cost. Conclusions In our cost effectiveness analysis based on United States health care system, we found that results from FIB-4, followed by either VCTE, MRE, or liver biopsy, detect cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD with a high level of accuracy and low cost. Compared to FIB-4 + VCTE which was the least costly strategy, FIB-4+MRE had lower ICER than FIB-4+LB

Interrogation of selected genes influencing serum LDL-Cholesterol levels in patients with well characterized NAFLD

Background: The clinical significance of rare mutations in LDL metabolism genes on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) severity is not well understood. Objective: To examine the significance of mutations in LDL metabolism genes including apolipoprotein B (APOB), proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) and LDL receptor (LDLR) in patients with NAFLD. Methods: Patients with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD from the NASH Clinical Research Network studies were stratified into 3 groups of LDL-C (≤50 mg/dL, 130-150 mg/dL, ≥ 190 mg/dL) and then 120 (40 per group) were randomly selected from the strata. We examined the presence of mutations on LDL genes and analyzed its association with selected NAFLD-related features. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for age, race, gender and use of statins. Results: Among 40 patients with LDL-C ≤ 50 mg/dL, 7 (18%) patients had heterozygous variants in APOB and 2 had heterozygous variants in PCSK9 (5%). We also found heterozygous mutations in 3 (8%) patients with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL; 2 and 1 located in LDLR and APOE genes, respectively. Compared to wild-type controls with LDL-C ≤ 50, APOB carriers displayed higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (85.86 ± 35.14 U/L vs 45.61 ± 20.84 U/L, Adj. P = 0.002) and steatosis >66% (57% vs 24%, Adj. P = 0.050). These associations remained statistically significant after excluding statin users. Other histological features of NAFLD severity were not different between wild-type controls and APOB mutation carriers. Conclusion: Mutations in the APOB gene are common among NAFLD patients with very low LDL-C and may be associated with increased aminotransferase levels and steatosis severity

The Protection Conferred by HSD17B13 rs72613567 Polymorphism on Risk of Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis May Be Limited to Selected Subgroups of Patients With NAFLD

Introduction: Our study aimed to explore how PNPLA3 rs738409 or phenotypic risk factors may moderate the relationship between HSD17B13 rs72613567 and risk of steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Methods: This analysis consisted of 1,153 non-Hispanic whites with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease enrolled in the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network studies. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease severity was determined by liver histology scored centrally according to the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network criteria. Moderation and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the influence of moderators (PNPLA3 rs738409, age, sex, body mass index, and diabetes) on the relationship between HSD17B13 rs72613567 and risk of steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Results: HSD17B13 rs72613567 genotype frequency was as follows: (-/-), 64%; (-/A), 30%; (A/A), 6%. Moderation analysis showed that the protective effect of HSD17B13 rs72613567 A-allele on risk of steatohepatitis remained only significant among patients with PNPLA3 rs738409 genotype CC (β coeff: -0.19, P = 0.019), women (β coeff: -0.18, P < 0.001), patients of age ≥ 45 years (β coeff: -0.18, P < 0.001), patients with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2 (β coeff: -0.17, P < 0.001), and patients with diabetes (β coeff: -0.18, P = 0.020). Among women, the protective effect of HSD17B131 rs72613567 A-allele on risk of steatohepatitis was stronger in those aged ≥ 51 years. Logistic regression-based sensitivity analysis including various important subgroups confirmed our observations. Discussion: The protection conferred by HSD17B13 rs72613567 A-allele on risk of steatohepatitis and fibrosis may be limited to selected subgroups of individuals who are aged ≥ 45 years, women and have class ≥ 2 obesity or diabetes, and those with PNPLA3 rs738409 CC genotype